The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the essential cause of why agricultural land being less fertile within three areas of the world in 1990s.
In general, there are three main reasons that affect land degradation: over-grazing, deforestation, and over-cultivation, and the total land being less productive more than 40% in total in three regions.
To begin with, over-grazing takes 35%, whereas deforestation, over-cultivation, and other reason spend 30%, 28%, and 7%, respectively. Both reasons cause 5% of overall land in North America becoming less productive. The top reason is that people do too much planting, so this made up more than half of the total land degraded. In contrast, more than 20% of total area being degraded in Europe. As can be seen, most of the land has degraded due to cutting down trees in the forest which is almost 10%, whereas over-cultivation and over-grazing are only 7.7% and 5.5%. Lastly, Oceania which consists of islands in the South Pacific, likewise Australia and New Zealand mainly degraded due to over-grazing and none caused by over-cultivation. Total land being less productive in this area is slightly less than 15%.
To sum up, the land becomes less fertile mainly causes by farming, then cutting down trees, and over-cultivation. Besides, Europe is the most impacted, then Oceania, and North America.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...fertile within three areas of the world in 1990s. In general, there are three main re...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, lastly, likewise, so, then, whereas, in contrast, in general, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26635514019 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15601886268 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570093457944 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6273829144 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.454545455 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205855849568 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930018191036 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083950288241 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168806167765 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600134606092 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.