The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The pie chart desmonstrates the crucial points why land become degrated on around the world and the table indicates these above reasons have mentioned that effected on countries in 3 regions including North America, Europe and Oceania during the period 90s.
Overall, the main reasons impacted on less productive of the agricultural land is that over-grazing, over-cultivation deforestation and others. The highest percentage of land degrated in European countries.
It can be seen from the first chart that the percentage of over grazing was the highest in all of the reasons, reached at 35 percent. The next point caused land degradation is that cutting off trees, ruined forrest and wild life. That cause had the percentage about a third. Approximately 28 percent, this number of over-cultivation, and other causes were at 7 percent.
Glancing at the second chart, these above causes affected 3 regions of world. Countries in Europe were affected much more than the rest regions About a quarter in total land degraded by 9.8% of deforestation, 7.7% over-cultivation and 5.5% grazing. Comparing to 2 regions, cutting tree had the highest number . The next region was Oceania, around 13% land degrated by cutting tree and grazing and at 1.7 and 11.3 respectively. It is obvious to see that the greatest percentage was over-grazing in all. North America was affected at 5% in total land degraded.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The pie chart desmonstrates the crucial points w...
^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...tage of over grazing was the highest in all of the reasons, reached at 35 percent. The nex...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 308, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ons, cutting tree had the highest number . The next region was Oceania, around 13%...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1175.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19911504425 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04408792702 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575221238938 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.7130219959 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3846153846 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3846153846 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.15384615385 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236862262542 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821188009137 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808071587518 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155031412775 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681668475543 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.