The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two charts show a number of the main factors which lead to land degradation in general and in 3 different areas in particular during the 1900s.
It is noticeable that the largest part is over-grazing which is considered to be a primary reason for the decrease of land quality in the world. Besides, the table illustrates that Europe has far higher proportion of unproductive land than North America and Oceania in 1900s.
The pie chart clearly shows that there is a large proportion of over-grazing accounts for over 35% in total. While deforestation and over-cultivation are represented by two smaller parts, 30% and 28% respectively. The smallest part which accounts for only 7% in total is the information about other reasons.
In term of the data in the table, the principal element leading to the land deterioration in Europe is deforestation. This accounts for a massive 9.8%, while this also affects a mere 0.2% land in North America and 1.7% land in Oceania. Additionally, over-grazing has negative influence on the vast majority of farmland decline in Oceania, about 11.3% land. By comparison with Europe and North America, this causes only 5.5% and 1.5% land destroyed respectively. Meanwhile, over-cultivation accounts for the lowest percentage of land decay compared with the remaining areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 266, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1900s'.
Suggestion: in the 1900s
...ive land than North America and Oceania in 1900s. The pie chart clearly shows that the...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, while, in fact, in general, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19811320755 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12517710427 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575471698113 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 16.0459052216 43.030603864 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.181818182 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146643069834 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570864030239 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470973729894 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101719864719 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457506784049 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.