The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.
The Given first circular chart reveals the information about less production of agricultural land by explaining some main reasons for it, and the second tabular graph depicts that how three regions: North America, Europe, Oceania, gets affected by infertile land during the year of 1990. It is a clear and coherent representation.
It can be seen that, worldwide land was affected by four main activities: over-cultivation, over-grazing, Deforestation, or by some other reasons. Following This, overgrazing was among the big cause of infertility of land. About 35%, 30% of the world's total land had been affected by overgrazing, Deforestation, respectively.
Further more, land degraded by four causes had a great impact on three region: North America, Europe, Oceania. The total land of Oceania which was degraded during the year of 1990 was 13% of the total. Moreover, 23% of the total land of Europe was degraded by some causes in the same year.
Overall, it is evident that the major cause of degradation of land was overgrazing, and at the same time europe is the region in which land degradation was more than in other regions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on about less production of agricultural land by explaining some main reasons for...
^^
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...explaining some main reasons for it, and the second tabular graph depicts that ho...
^^
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'region' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'regions'.
Suggestion: regions
...four causes had a great impact on three region: North America, Europe, Oceania. The to...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13440860215 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01589901946 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.5324775346 43.030603864 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.111111111 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225129632642 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933758969912 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063096771 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143820825892 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572451144235 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.