The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990.
The given circular chart depicts the information about the main four causes of land degradation (over-cultivation, over-grazing, deforstation and other) while, the tabular chart illustrates the regions , which were affected by these causes in the year of 1990.The data is calibrated in percentum.
It can be seen that about one third proportion of global's land is affected by overgrazing, which is recorded as the highest proportion. In addition, exact 30% of world's land becomes less productive due to the deforsation. Moreover, over-cultivation or other.
As far as trend was concerned, the maximum land was degraded in Europe (23%) in the year of 1990, in which contribution of deforsation, over-cultivation and over-grazing were 9.8%, 7.7% and 5.5% respectively. Furthermore, North America contributed to the least land degradation. Oceania had no over-cultivation however, it had the highest over-grazing that leads to 13% of the global's land degradation.
Overall, it is evident that over-grazing activity is the major cause of land degradation compare to the other three main reasons however, Europe contributed to the maximun land degradation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the main four causes of land degradation over-cultivation, over-grazing, deforsta...
^^
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he tabular chart illustrates the regions , which were affected by these causes in ...
^^
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ted by these causes in the year of 1990.The data is calibrated in percentum. It ca...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, moreover, so, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6091954023 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.55481851771 2.65546596893 134% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.0075154653 43.030603864 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187362685258 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819506041382 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671669721489 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129633999795 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525750392581 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.