The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie chart represents the four important causes of degradation of land all over the world and the table lists three regions and the amount of degraded land along with reasons in percentages.
Overall, deforestation and over-grazing were the major contributing factors of degradation of land throughout the world while excess-cultivation had also a significant proportion. Considering the regions, europe had a fair amount of degraded land which was followed by oceania and then in north-america.
Globally, over-grazing contributed to 35% while the deforestation accounted for 30% which was closely followed by over-cultivation at 28%. However, other reasons accounted, for a mere 7% of the total.
In 1990, europe had the highest degraded land which was 23% in which deforestation was the major factor while in case of oceania, surprisingly over-cultivation accounted for nothing while over-grazing and deforestation together contributed to make a total of 13%. North-america had the least amount of degraded land with just 5% in which more than fifty-percent of share was from over-cultivation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6369047619 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.64600218268 2.65546596893 137% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5119607255 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.285714286 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0807638141378 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479306958183 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644613354782 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705741723782 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770521980004 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.4140731707 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.