The pie chart informs the causes of agricultural land that becomes less productive. The other data is described in the table. It explains degraded land in three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The highest contribution of land degradation is due to over-grazing (35%). In number two, deforestation gives 30 percent of the land degradation. Another factor of land degradation is over-cultivation (28%). The rest causes is categorized b 'other' (7%).
In total, during the 1990s, Europe was the highest in land degradation with 23 percent, followed by Oceania (13%) and North America (5%). specifically, land degraded by deforestation in Europe was the highest among other regions while North America was the lowest. In over-cultivation, Europe had 7.7 percent and North America 3.3 percent. In contrast, there was no land degradation by this activity in Oceania. However, Oceania became the highest in over-grazing by 11.3 percent, followed by Europe (5.5%) and North America (1.5 %).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Specifically
...ed by Oceania 13% and North America 5%. specifically, land degraded by deforestation in Euro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32258064516 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15438681003 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541935483871 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => Sentence length is too short
Sentence length SD: 28.9236302854 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.75 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.9166666667 22.9334400587 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128368861168 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676915030598 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103307301001 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141702115194 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133374982749 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => The average readability is low. Need to improve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.