Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is still a debate in the teaching method between open discussion and full lectures class. In my opinion, the class with most of the activities are discussion is better than that without. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, I feel that open discussion class will drive students to be more focus on the object discussed. The discussion process involves the two-way communication between the teacher and students. This means that the students have to focus and understand the topic discussed. For instance, I experienced taking an open discussing class during my undergraduate. The multi-way of communication in the class forced me to get involved in the discussion. Moreover, it made me focus on the topic and be able to give my opinion regarding the topic.
Secondly, the discussion process obligate students to talk in front of many people. It stimulates students to be more confidence. For example, when I was in college, I have an unconfident friend. But during the open discussion class, he started to talk in front of the class, and eventually he became more confident to talk in front of the group.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the open discussion model brings more benefits to the students rather than an inactive lectures class.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 1977.66487455 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 220.0 407.700716846 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.48103885553 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86145660185 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 212.727598566 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509090909091 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 618.680645161 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2316991599 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.5714285714 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7142857143 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.45110844103 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252274966397 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939196935508 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597702705015 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167150650493 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016677610998 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.