The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given two charts provide information about the major four causes responsible for the land degradation in three different regions namely North America, europe and Oceania in the world in 1990s.
Overall, the over-grazing is the main reason to deplete the farming land. Moreover, the land of europe depleted more as compared to other two reasons due to deforestation and over-cultivation.
The first chart indicates that the first most significant reason to degrade the land was over-grazing which accounts by 35% whereas deforestation was the second reason to deplete the agricultural land by 30%. over-cultivation degrade only 28% of land area and others reasons accounted by only 7%.
The second chart illustrates that europe suffered a lot from deforestation and over cultivation by 9.8% and 7. 7% respectively. While, Oceania faced from over grazing which accounted by 11. 3% and having no effect of over cultivation. Lastly, the land of north america was not much more affected by all the reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...merica, europe and Oceania in the world in 1990s. Overall, the over-grazing is the ma...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rope and Oceania in the world in 1990s. Overall, the over-grazing is the main re...
^^^
Line 2, column 118, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...eover, the land of europe depleted more as compared to other two reasons due to de...
^^
Line 2, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to deforestation and over-cultivation. The first chart indicates that the first...
^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...econd reason to deplete the agricultural land by 30%. over-cultivation degrade on...
^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over-cultivation
... deplete the agricultural land by 30%. over-cultivation degrade only 28% of land area and other...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd others reasons accounted by only 7%. The second chart illustrates that europ...
^^^
Line 4, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...only 7%. The second chart illustrates that europe suffered a lot from deforest...
^^
Line 4, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...forestation and over cultivation by 9.8% and 7. 7% respectively. While, Oceania f...
^^
Line 4, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...vation by 9.8% and 7. 7% respectively. While, Oceania faced from over grazing which ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, lastly, moreover, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26708074534 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10529191115 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596273291925 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.8 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2222222222 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156292013899 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603560884229 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570584661871 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105683442863 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453209951643 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.