The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the U.S between 1988 and 2000.
The charts and table provide information on the total cost of brought in fish and the origins throughout three years (1988, 1992, and 2000).
Overall, the aggregated value of fish was the highest in 2000. It’s spotted that fish was mostly transported from Canada than any other country in 1988. However, in 1992 and 2000 other countries exported the topmost compared to Canada and China.
To start with, in 1988 the total value was the least among the three years. But the increase through the years has been gradually, the difference between each year was around 2.5 billion dollars. Moving on, in 1988 China was only providing less than a one fifth hence being the least. On the other hand, China showed a slight increase in 1992 and 2000, but in general China was the least to show noticeable fluctuations.
Then, a drastic change has been recognized from other countries, increasing by 19% from 1988 to 1992. As a result, other countries became predominant in comparison to the rest. In addition, a drastic change has been noticeable, Canada declining from 1988 to 1992 by 26%. Moving on, Canada continued to decrease its exports slowly from 1992 to 2000, only providing moderately more than a quarter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...out three years 1988, 1992, and 2000. Overall, the aggregated value of fish wa...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...topmost compared to Canada and China. To start with, in 1988 the total value w...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...east to show noticeable fluctuations. Then, a drastic change has been recogniz...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, then, in addition, in general, as a result, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93170731707 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47565661376 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551219512195 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.5282041153 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.25 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0833333333 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193544521607 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829079384012 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876839241781 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153377313004 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102616640496 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.