Pie Charts below show changes in annual spending by a particular UK School in 1981 1991 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparison where necessary.
The three Pie Charts illustrate, the information regarding annual expenditure by particular school in UK in 3 years 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Overall, majority of the proportion of budget spending was constituted by teachers, and other workers salaries about 60%, while insurance made least contribution, and others figures fluctuated.
To begin with, budget spending on teachers salaries, resources for example, books and on insurance increased from 1981 to 1991 with figures of 40% 15% and 2% in 1981, and 50% 20% and 3% in 1991. On the other hand, total expenditure on other workers salaries and furniture and equipment fell 6 and 10% during 1981 to 1991.
However, in 2001 out of total school spending teachers salaries made about 45% which was 5% less than 1991.Whereas, other workers salaries comprised 15% about 7% less than 1991. Resources also went down 11% as compared to 1991. Furthermore both insurance, and furniture and equipment gained 5 and 18% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'made the least'.
Suggestion: made the least
...ers salaries about 60%, while insurance made least contribution, and others figures fluctu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Whereas
...e about 45% which was 5% less than 1991.Whereas, other workers salaries comprised 15% a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e about 45% which was 5% less than 1991.Whereas, other workers salaries comprised 15% a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...also went down 11% as compared to 1991. Furthermore both insurance, and furniture and equip...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, regarding, so, whereas, while, for example, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24203821656 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8705558479 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605095541401 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3411956166 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.571428571 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.5714285714 5.23603664747 297% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200722911949 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10034500886 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1179407398 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152057899621 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133554554081 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.