The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years

The pie diagrams illustrate the energy production of five types ( gas, coal, other, nuclear, and petro ) from 1995 to 2005-
Overall, it can be easily seen, having five parts symbolize kinds of energy production which are gas, coal, other, nuclear, and petro. Otherwise, while coal and gas for the most rate in charts apart from energy production, above the 29 percentages comparing charts.
It is apparent that, in the two graphs, energy production a massive rate of coal and gas for above ( 29 percent and below 31 percent). On the other hand, the petro gain a pretty high percentage for these Producation 29.27 percent in 1995 and 19.55 percent in 2005 considering relevant data. Additionally, although become a smaller part of Producation, the nuclear and other saturated respecatively 6.4 percent in 1995 and 10.10 in 2005, 4.9 percent in 2005 and 9.10 percent in 2005.
In contrast, following gas, coal producation above 29 percent with nuclear and other while the least 6 percent and 4 percent and below 11 percent to 10 percent. Finally, the rest is nucler and others producation increased, which is higher than 5 percent from 1995

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rate the energy production of five types gas, coal, other, nuclear, and petro fr...
^^
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es gas, coal, other, nuclear, and petro from 1995 to 2005- Overall, it can be e...
^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a massive rate of coal and gas for above 29 percent and below 31 percent. On the ...
^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y 6.4 percent in 1995 and 10.10 in 2005, 4.9 percent in 2005 and 9.10 percent in ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, while, apart from, as for, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64721669545 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.0514264895 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.714285714 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102799836546 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570734314709 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637939890393 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0834249548923 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475464867956 0.0819641961636 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.