The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years 1995 and 2005
The given pie charts illustrate the comparison of five distinct energy outputs including gas, coal, nuclear, petrol and other in France in two years 1995 and 2005.
Overall, as can be seen, while the proportion of petrol manufactured experienced a decline, the figures for the rest of the energy sources have an opposite tendency. Moreover, coal and gas were the greatest significant productions of energy in both years.
In particular, the proportion of coal manufactured ranked first at 29,8 percent and 30,93 percent in 1995 and 2005 respectively. In 1995, that percentage of gas produced stood at 29,63 percent before increasing marginally to 30,31 percent in the next 10 years, making it the second position.
The year 1995 witnessed the proportion of petrol produced standing at 29,27 percent but later, the was a dramatic fall of 9,72 percent in that data of petrol output, however, in both years the rank third still belonged to petrol.
In terms of nuclear and other manufactured, despite the lowest position in comparison with coal, gas and petrol, the proportion of them went through a remarkable climb. both the percentage of nuclear produced and other produced in 2005 was in the vicinity of twice times as much as that data in 1995.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
...f them went through a remarkable climb. both the percentage of nuclear produced and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, third, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05314009662 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73551977687 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9405373578 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.75 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200937538871 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09679701176 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106966573901 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130342575089 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121864002282 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.