The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This graph is about where people aged between 18 and 25 years usually watch television. Data were taken respectively in years 2009 and 2019. Youngsters tend to watch television in six main ways: mobile phone, laptop, tablet, desktop computer, flat screen tv or conventional tv.
People’s habits changed dramatically during years. In 2009 the most used way to watch tv was by using a conventional TV. This choice was made by more than a third of the sample. By the opposite, the least popular one was tablet, used by 1 person out 20, followed by flat-screen TV with an 8% use percentage. In the second pie, we can see how conventional tv percentage dropped insanely, reaching a 4%, letting flat screens, tablet and mobile phones grow on popularity.
We can extrapolate from these charts that there has been a huge change in the last decade, probably due to the fact that technology had developed new solutions. Flat screens in fact in these years have become cheaper and people have forgotten their old-fashioned conventional televisions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ere people aged between 18 and 25 years use to watch television. Data were taken re...
^^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...009 the most used way to watch tv was by using a conventional TV. This choice was...
^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erson out 20, followed by flat-screen TV with a 8% use percentage. In the second ...
^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ut 20, followed by flat-screen TV with a 8% use percentage. In the second pie, w...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, third, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97714285714 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86543938291 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691428571429 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9081137729 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158468953786 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659329152523 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752172825832 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112920671768 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732521349045 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.