The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts compares, producing electricity by the five sources such as, coal, petroleum, natural gas, nuclear and hydro power in two countries namely, New zealand and Germany over the years of 1980 and 2010.
Overall, it has been clear that, Germany producing more electricity than New zealand over the period given. At once, In 2010, the total production of electrical power has doubled than 1980 in Germany.
In 1980, the sum of New zealand electrical power was 127 units, which is increased to 200 units by 2010. The main source of electricity was coal in New zealand in 1980 ( 56 units) which is dramatically surged to 150 units after 20 years. However, natural gas and petroleum consist of 30% in 1980 which plummet to mere 2% in the year of 2010. Moreover, hydro electrical power accounts for 30units and 46 units in 1980 and 2010 respectively.
In Germany, the total electricity generated by given sources were 107 units(1980) and 214 units (2010). The significant growth of electrical power by nuclear energy during the period given. Such as, in 1980 only 20% of current supplied by nuclear which is rapidly increased to 155 units by 2010 among the other sources. Likewise, hydro and nuclear gas were noticeable reduction electricity from 7units and 28 units to mere 2units at the end of the period. Furthermore, coal consist of relatively stable ratio with 28% in both year and petroleum makes up 22% to 27 % by 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...over the period given. At once, In 2010, the total production of electrical power...
^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctricity was coal in New zealand in 1980 56 units which is dramatically surged to...
^^
Line 8, column 527, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ively stable ratio with 28% in both year and petroleum makes up 22% to 27 % by 20...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88571428571 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57350464703 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518367346939 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4335992013 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.75 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256781152416 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107900385357 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594457504581 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179656453825 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411434920391 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.