The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The depicted pie charts enumerate the information about sources of electricity generation in New Zealand and Germany for over three decades.
Overall, the use of Coal for generating electricity in New Zealand increased considerably. Similarly, the portion of Nuclear seems to have risen dramatically over the given period. Surprisingly, Nuclear saw a certain decline in both respective countries.
To initiate, the most marked change had seen in the ratio of Coal, peaking from 56 in 1980 to approximately 150 in 2010, which makes up the biggest source of acquiring electricity in New Zealand. In addition, in 1980, hydro boast an impressive 30 units of the 120 units in New Zealand. However, by 2010, the figure had peaked significantly to 46 unit. Followed by, Natural Gas and Petroleum had faced a drastic decline over the given period.
Furthermore, the majority of Germany had experienced an enormous contribution to obtain electricity via Nuclear, rising from 20 units in 1980 to nearly 160 in 2010, while the figures for Petroleum in Germany went up slightly from 22 unit in 1980 to roughly one-quarter unit in 2010. Interestingly, the ratio of coal had remained stable in both respective years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24615384615 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02585831467 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 65.6048778674 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.3 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239041783603 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091438153918 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100908297757 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16692131402 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919632470643 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.