the pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010
The pie chart give information about the amount of energy used from 5 different sources in Germany and New Zealand between 1980 and 2010.
Overall, the total amount of energy generated in both nations increased over the period of 30 years. In addition, the electricity generation from nuclear source was only used in Germany.
Germany was seen an increase by 73 units in the total amount of energy while the figure for New Zealand was 107 units in total
In New Zealand, the largest amount of energy was represented by Coal with 56 units, followed by Hydro with 30% in 1980. there was an significant increase in the amount of electricity generation by Coal to 150 units in 2010 while the figure for Hydro source increased slightly by 16 units. By contrast, from 1980 to 2010, Petroleum and Natural gas source were seen dramatic decreases in the amount of energy generation, by 9 units and 28 units respectively.
In Germany, the amount of energy came from Coal and Natural gas were equal in 1958 with 28 units. Petroleum source and Nuclear source generated the same the amount of electricity, at 22 units and 20 units accordingly while those for Hydro source was just 7 units. In 2010, German saw a significant surge in the amount of energy produced from Nuclear source, by 135 units which was much higher than the remaining categories, compared to 28 units of Coal, 27 units of Petroleum and only total 4 units for Natural gas and Hydro source.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 121, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...ts, followed by Hydro with 30% in 1980. there was an significant increase in the amou...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 131, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ed by Hydro with 30% in 1980. there was an significant increase in the amount of e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79446640316 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52510709707 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442687747036 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 370.8 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.287623869 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.777777778 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1111111111 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227012244317 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125265593276 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109517867692 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178017996087 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116635110243 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.