A glance at the pie charts provided illustrates the changes in the amount of electricity which were produced by different sources of fuel in Australia and France during the period of 20 years from 1980 to 2000.
This is such a clear-cut evidence from the provided information that total production in both countries almost doubled through the entire period. In addition, Australian prefered using coal to produce electricity to using oil, nuclear power, hydro power, and natural gas during the time while French would rather produce electricity by nuclear power than use the others in 2000.
In 1980, Australia produced 100 units of electricity but half of them were from coal. Oil was the most uncommon fuel sources for producing electricity, which stood at 10 units. After mere 20 year, the total production rose to 170 units and coal was still the most prevalent fuel source for electricity production, accounting for 130 units. Besides, natural gas suffered a decline to the least popular source as oil with 2 units.
Turning to the fuel source in France, the electricity production in total was 90 units in 1980 and it doubled to 180 units in 2000. The striking feature is that the nuclear power used to produce electricity in 1980 was only 15 units. However, it became the most dominant fuel source with nearly 75 percent (126 units out of 180 units) after 20 years. Not forgetting to mention that the percentage of others fuel source went down in 2000.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 717.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71710526316 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49270924432 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598684210526 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.6438954724 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.625 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234176010802 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113924382688 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066650547433 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197194977596 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446514609167 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.