The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare the production of electricity in units from 5 different sources of fuel in 2 countries in 1980 and 2000
Overall, the total amount of electricity witnessed a dramatic increase from 1980 to 2000 in both Australia and France, However, there were distinct differences in the sources of power supplies and their contributions to the electricity production in each country
In 1980, 50 out of 100 units of electricity was produced from coal in Australia, rising to 130 out of 170 in 2000. Meanwhile, the total energy production in France doubled within 2 years and 75% of which in 2000 was harnessed from nuclear power
Moreover, while natural gas generated an insignificant amount of energy in both countries, the contribution of hydropower and oil followed in the two nations followed opposite trends. The dependence of Australia on Hydropower remained under 25% in both years, its figure in France was, however, minimal. In contrast, oil was the second most important source of fuel in France, its use in Australia declined from 10 units to 2 units in 2000
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cant amount of energy in both countries, the contribution of hydropower and oil f...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06111111111 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9105756505 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538888888889 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 22.4926829268 200% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 158.846624138 43.030603864 369% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 227.75 112.824112599 202% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 45.0 22.9334400587 196% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.5 5.23603664747 277% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265014675376 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143253658387 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977088280323 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198562159296 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958753836435 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.9 13.2329268293 188% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 10.3012195122 191% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.96 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 11.4329268293 249% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 20.0 10.9970731707 182% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.