The plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.
The maps outline the current layout of a sports complex of a particular university together with some further predictions of its outlook after the upcoming refurbishment.
Overall, a comparison between the two maps reveals a shift from a simple sports center into a densely organized complex.
At present, the building consists of the main center and two outdoor courts located to the east and the west of it. Inside the main building, there is a reception facing the main entrance and a swimming pool exactly in the middle of the map. There is also access to the seating and the changing room on both sides of the pool as well as a gym on the north verge of the center.
According to the second map, two outdoor courts are predicted to be merged with the central part to form the overall expansion of the sports center. The west court will be demolished to make way for the new leisure pool, while the other court will be replaced by two new dance studios and a sports hall next to the initial seating. Two new changing rooms are forecasted to be erected in the south corners, with each in turn adjacent to the café and the sports shop. To the north of the pool, the gym will be doubled in size, whereas other features are going to be unchanged.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...changing room on both sides of the pool as well as a gym on the north verge of the center....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 292, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...replaced by two new dance studios and a sports hall next to the initial seating. Two n...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, second, so, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53744493392 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40657692378 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533039647577 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.5937844922 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.444444444 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101338824857 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419045721049 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458057149661 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.066764894852 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564371037577 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.