The plans below show the public park when it first open in 1920 and the same park today
The given illustrations compare the layout of Grange park which was originally constructed in 1920 with the recent design of it.
Overall, it is clear that the basic layout remained the same with two entrance in the north and south,x and one rose garden in the north-west. The addition of features such as amphitheatre, water feature, and children’s playground replaces the café, fountain, stage for musicians, glasshouse, and pond.
As far as the west side of the park is concerned, trough the entrance of Arnold avenue, there was a fountain in the centre of the park, however the rose garden replaces it, which is surrounded by seating arrangement in the four direction. On the west of the fountain, the stage for musicians is removed, as they inroduced the amphitheatre for concerts. The rose garden in the north-west remained there, although the one in the south-west is demolished.
On east of the fountain, the water feature installed in place of Glasshouse and seating benches. There were two significant changes made in the north-east. Firstly,the café replaces the rose garden, secondly, the instroduction of the children’s play area is built where the pond was exist.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , x
...with two entrance in the north and south,x and one rose garden in the north-west. ...
^^
Line 6, column 163, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... changes made in the north-east. Firstly,the café replaces the rose garden, secondly...
^^^^
Line 6, column 288, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...s play area is built where the pond was exist.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21243523316 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04937136735 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549222797927 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9593449229 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.777777778 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0771649643033 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301707854222 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487167273344 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.05369837507 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459766901488 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.