THE TABLE SHOWN BELOW DETAILS ABOUT THE INCOME SHARES IN THE UK IN 1998
The given table illustrates the rate of income spent on four different needs such as food, electronic, music and videos by people categorised based on their age and sex in the Uk in 1998.
Overall, it is clear that music was a highly popular in girls while the high rate of income spend on electronic gadgets by young boys and children. As age increases, the ratio of money exchanged to get service has changed. Buying food is the prime priority hence, it is the demanding expense in adults,men, and women.
As far as children and kids are concerned, 19% of the cash used by girls were to get music and followed by videos by 12% whereas boys and children preferred to buy gadgets most, 40% and 24%, respectively; however, the ratio decreases as age increases. In fact, the preference of the product purchase is almost same for boys and children.
On the other side, adults, males, and females invested their money for food only even though males accounted to spend the highest amount of money by 50% for it.
In terms of music, these three groups used 19% of their money for music; however, the videos purchases was the least popular among them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 301, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , men
...e, it is the demanding expense in adults,men, and women. As far as children and k...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, whereas, while, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69458128079 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4145972321 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581280788177 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3031418637 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.125 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0598585601412 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0263849420859 0.103423049105 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056133390398 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0398917515545 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663588626551 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.