The plans below show a public park when it is first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
The given diagrams give information about some facilities and infrastructures for Grange Park between early opining in 1920 and current situation. In general, the first impression from diagram is that old design has fountain and a stage for musicians which, not exists in structure now. In addition, some infrastructures are eliminated from modern design such as glasshouse.
First of all, in 1920 the park has fountain in the heart of park which is replaced by rose garden and four groups of seats in design today. Furthermore, the collections of seats exist into all direction northern, southern, western and eastern. Whereas, there are no seats in these direction in structure nowadays. Moreover, cafe is added to the park now. Glasshouse and stage for musicians in 1920 design, these are replaced by water feature and amphitheater for concrete respectively. However, the remarkable addition to current design is underground car parks to let visitors park their automobile in safe place. Finally, in 1920, rose garden is located in the right and left sides of high entrance, left corner of bottom entrance as well. Whilst, in park today, there has been the rose garden in left side of higher entrance and in the central of park
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...orthern, southern, western and eastern. Whereas, there are no seats in these direction ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this direction' or 'these directions'?
Suggestion: this direction; these directions
...eastern. Whereas, there are no seats in these direction in structure nowadays. Moreover, cafe i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 854, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gher entrance and in the central of park
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, moreover, so, well, whereas, in addition, in general, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10891089109 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80239999654 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564356435644 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7856977037 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8181818182 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2727272727 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233608620053 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918813939861 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092932427981 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166533409539 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816148486099 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.