The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.

Essay topics:

The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.

A glance of line graph reveals striking similarities about water consumption in the word for agriculture, industrial, and domestic uses from 1900 to 2000. While the table illustrates the consuming of water in Brazil and Congo countries in 2000.
Overall, the highest use of global water is an agriculture purpose. While the smallest use in the consumption of water is a domestic use. Likewise, Brazil is consumed water more than Congo in 2000.
According to the line graph, the use of global water stood at around 500 KM3 for the agriculture sector in 1900. Whereas, in the same year the global water use for both industrial use and domestic use was almost 0 KM3. Then increased the water’s consumption steadily to approximately 40 KM3, 100 KM3, and 1000KM3 for agriculture, industrial, domestic uses respectively in 1950. Moreover, the water’s consuming rose significantly in 2000 to around 3000 KM3 for agriculture, which was triple times of industrial use in the same year. The table depicted the population of Brazil and Congo countries. Furthermore, the highest consumption was in Brazil with 26.500 KM2. Whereas, the lowest use was in Congo with 100 KM2.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 68, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...global water is an agriculture purpose. While the smallest use in the consumption of ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of global water stood at around 500 KM3 for the agriculture sector in 1900. Wher...
^^
Line 3, column 676, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...sumption was in Brazil with 26.500 KM2. Whereas, the lowest use was in Congo with 100 K...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, likewise, moreover, then, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15183246073 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99758224258 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476439790576 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8256617438 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9166666667 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305551536002 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138446322635 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065573922018 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251736561599 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247517394028 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.