The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two diagrams illustrate the grand park plan back in 1920 and at present condition.
Overall, the entrance on the two sides of the park is unchanged, however, most of the features have been distorted: some of which are newly added.
Firstly, the seats were arranged randomly on all sides of the park in 1920, but currently, they are well organized in the middle of the park circumscribing the rose garden (in place of the fountain in 1920) from four sides. Pond for water plants is replaced by children play area followed by cafe instead of the rose garden near the pond. In addition, the demolition of the glasshouse to give a way for water feature can be seen in the plan.
Furthermore, the Rose garden in the left upper part of the map is in pristine condition while it is eliminated in the existing condition. The stage for musicians has been converted into the Amphitheatre for concerts with a slight modification in its orientation. Interestingly, an underground car parking facility is provided for the public near the entrance in today's park.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7967032967 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80192306345 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6634113213 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.125 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 5.23603664747 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179763075345 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769409822448 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694160603176 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110386431564 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218097894179 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.