Rail transport in four countries in 2007
The table gives us information about rail transport in four countries in 2007 specifically in UK, USA, Japan, and Italy. It also provides the number of people using rail in case not including metro, the passenger kilometers per head of population, and cargo carried is measured in billion of tons completely. Overall, as can be seen that the highest number of people that usually using railway happened to be in Japan whilst the lowest one was in USA contrastively.
Regarding to the data, the society of Japan preferred to use rail transportation instead of personal transport which its number reached to 27 as the most positive movement country. It was supported by the amount of passenger population in kilometers per head that noted at 770 and cargo carried was about 23.01 billion of tons amply. Then the second highest rail transport passenger had to be in the UK which number marked at 5.9 differently. The amount of passenger established by the capacity in kilometers per head which stood at 770 and the lading of rail was 22.2 billion of tons respectively.
Additional, italy’s number was following UK and got 5.5 which was lower. It was also related with amount of passenger in kilometers per head counted at 80 whilst the capacity of load was 21.9 billion of tons. Then italy was followed by USA that possess 0.3 number of people that using rail transport as the lowest country obviously. Its population in kilometers per head was only at 80 and the cargo capacity happened to be 2.8 billion of tons totally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...ation, and cargo carried is measured in billion of tons completely. Overall, as can be ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86590038314 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76396884725 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455938697318 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 388.8 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9114972325 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.454545455 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201170125609 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100085097915 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134636848646 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152535811591 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661361471425 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.