Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Today, major focus of parents and children is on the facilities provided by the school. Public school generally lacks major facilities in comparison to private schools due to unavailability of funds and resources. It is agreed that placing advertisements in public school would help them acquire additional funds and resources. The essay will analyze how additional funds through advertisement would help public school in increasing student intake and contribute towards social responsibility.
Firstly, funds through advertisement would help public school increase the student intake. For example, they can have large library with varieties of books, extracurricular facilities like swimming pool, etc. Thus, such facilities would attract students and the student intake will increase. Therefore this is the main reason how advertisement fund is beneficial to public school.
A second reason is that additional fund through advertisement would let public school work for the society. For instance, public school can offer scholarship and reduced fee admission to underprivileged kids. Hence, this way public school can fulfill its social responsibility. Thus, another reason why public school should explore additional funds through advertisement.
Analyzing the above points makes it obvious that additional funds through advertisement would help school increase student intake and shape underprivileged kids. Thus, advertisements in public school helps gain them funds and eventually help the students. It is recommended that public school should explore advertisements as additional source of income.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...s and the student intake will increase. Therefore this is the main reason how advertiseme...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 1.00243902439 1297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 6.02608695652 4.92477711251 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1275228002 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 406.8 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3772629361 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3333333333 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238429480384 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114187998811 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506549226063 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178758553885 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038555935202 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.1 11.4140731707 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.