The table and chart shows data from a survey of library users.
The bar chart depicts the reasons why people go to libraries and the table gives information on the opinions that people of different age groups provided in 2012.
Overall, the intention of coming to libraries for research was of the highest prevalence among three age groups, whereas the least number of library-goers used this type of public facility for borrowing newspapers. In addition, the consideration of the importance of library increase as people are aging.
As per the chart, regarding reading for researching purposes, there was a noticeable mere 10% gap in the number of teenagers and other age group counterparts as the former crossing the halfway mark whereas the latter was just somewhere in the vicinity of 40%. The trend is similar for borrowing books as the proportion of teenagers to young adults was approximately three-fifths. However, those aged around 17 didn't borrow newspapers from the library as many as those older.
In addition, according to the table, the age group of 16-17 had the highest frequency of going to libraries but took these public commodities into account the least, with 72% and 54%, respectively. Noticeably, only nearly 20% of adults got help from librarians as opposed to 43% seen in the group of younger counterparts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e-fifths. However, those aged around 17 didnt borrow newspapers from the library as m...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In addition, according to the table, the age group of 16-17 had the highest f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1690821256 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90463933791 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618357487923 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6102204474 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.75 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143547360328 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629417895219 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402442030578 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906167890407 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02959692259 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.