The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.
The table gives information about how many men and women were employed in factories in England and Wales over a 40 year period (1851-1891) of 10 year interval.
Overall, more males were employed over the period than females except in 1861. Also, the greatest number of personnel was employed in 1851, while the least amount was recorded in 1901. There were the highest number of factories in 1881 and the least in 1851.
In 1851, the number of employed men far exceeded that of women with 97,100 personnel at 287,100 and 190,000 respectively. Similarly, from 1871 to 1891, the difference narrowed with 20,000 to 26,000. Furthermore,at he end of the period the difference became insignificant with 31,000 males and 30,000 females employed. In comparison, the number of females employed in 1861 was considerably greater than males, while the figure for the former stood high at 160,000, the latter was about 130,000 lower at 131,780.
In terms of factories, the highest figure of 721 was noted in 1881, whereas in 1871, 1891 and 1901, the total number of factories revolve around 600 to 625. However the least number of factories was recorded in 1851 and 1861 at 225 and 227 respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'interval' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'intervals'.
Suggestion: intervals
...r a 40 year period 1851-1891 of 10 year interval. Overall, more males were employed o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... employed men far exceeded that of women with 97,100 personnel at 287,100 and 190...
^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...larly, from 1871 to 1891, the difference narrowed with 20,000 to 26,000. Furtherm...
^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , at
...rowed with 20,000 to 26,000. Furthermore,at he end of the period the difference be...
^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'at the end'?
Suggestion: at the end
...owed with 20,000 to 26,000. Furthermore,at he end of the period the difference became in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'ends'.
Suggestion: ends
...ith 20,000 to 26,000. Furthermore,at he end of the period the difference became in...
^^^
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...000. Furthermore,at he end of the period the difference became insignificant with...
^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...came insignificant with 31,000 males and 30,000 females employed. In comparison, ...
^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...figure of 721 was noted in 1881, whereas in 1871, 1891 and 1901, the total number...
^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...of factories revolve around 600 to 625. However the least number of factories was recor...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, whereas, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5984418408 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0737442341 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209279797766 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946114296657 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724090882616 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146119200262 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530901664819 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.