The table below give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in European countries
The tables illustrate the information about the annual sold quantity of fairtrade labelled coffee and banana in five various countries (UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden) in 1999 and 2004. Units are measured in million euros. Overall, those five countries have been increased consumption of banana and coffee in 2004 rather than in 1999.
Turn to the first table, Switzerland people mist liked to drink coffee in 1999 It was 1.8 billions of euro while Sweden people have less attention to drink coffee and they had been an outlay of coffee in 0.8millions of euros. so the other three countries are spent normally less amount of money on coffee. But, when 2004, It was completely changed. Furthermore, England had been a significant difference in the consumption of coffee in these two years. It was approximately 18.5million of euros.
Considering the banana table, UK was exceeded outlay of plants other four countries in given two years. However, Belgium, where has the least sold of banana and Sweden expenditure of banana, declined in 2004 rather than 1999 while the other three countries had been gradually increased in the sale of banana.
To sum up, There were five countries had been a variation of sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and banana.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...in 1999 and 2004. Units are measured in million euros. Overall, those five countries ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8 billion'.
Suggestion: 8 billion
... liked to drink coffee in 1999 It was 1.8 billions of euro while Sweden people have less atte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...tlay of coffee in 0.8millions of euros. so the other three countries are spent nor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10096153846 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66684386739 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524038461538 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 64.1622427011 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4545454545 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363649424516 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132950686135 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128567195838 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253218152222 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107720037492 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.