The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australia men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.

Essay topics:

The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australia men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.

The multiple bar graph illustrates the information about how many male and female people doing regular physical activity under six different age groups in Australia in 2010. Overall, most of the female person had been liked doing daily exercise for their body fitness.

Furthermore, male who is young age such as students have very attraction doing physical activities rather than female students that different was approximately 5%. when increased women age, they had been attracted to engaging some attempts. So The major proportion of accuping exercise in women was middle-agers (45 to 54) which is exactly 53.3% while the least percentage was represented 35 to 44 age group and it was less than 40%. Indeed, The greatest percentage of men engaging in physical activities was constituted younger generation student which was slightly under 50 percent while the least group was 35 to 44 age team, It was nearly 40%. The greatest difference between male and female who engaged the physical activity was 35 to 44 that was exactly 13%. The elderly men and women group had been approximately similar to doing outdoor exercises in 2010.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...ts that different was approximately 5%. when increased women age, they had been attr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 829, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... group had been approximately similar to doing outdoor exercises in 2010.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12972972973 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70396727173 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3207142803 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.625 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281360063242 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132761877643 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818515114485 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219128350106 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00349511920208 0.0819641961636 4% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.