It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents. for instance, sport or music and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sportsperson or musician.
It is often said that become a talented sportsperson or excellent musician according to their born with the certain ability and others believed that anybody can be taught hard work and good practice to become talented sporty person or musician. However, that two sides have an authenticity. So this essay will be discussed both sides of that matter with examples.
On the one hand, every people born on their mother's stomach and every infancy live their mother's tummy in ten-month so that time duration, infancy learned various activity and various feelings with his mother. According to a psychologist, they said, many times infancy built via his parent genes which were directly effected that baby therefore, many times those child absorbed parent's skills and talended. Consequencely, ch, children who were born including many talented get many benefits. Firstly, they can easily reach their target among inherit birth skills. An example, "Little star" which is the most popular singing competition under 12years in Sri lanka, the wining child was 4 years old. He can sing well according to correct and smothly, melody and tune through his powerful voice controlling that talent gave him in his birth.
On the other hand, some people think children can be reached their peak of skill through well practice and trained. I personally believed any child always trained or played sport or instrument, after a time period, he can be played well. Furthermore, there is more skill than some learning techniques so he can not learn extra-talented that skill. How to be a good musician and sportman, no matter, It needs to particular training and practice.
In conclusion, natural talent and particular learning were most important to become a goog sportsman or musician.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'times'' or 'time's'?
Suggestion: times'; time's
...ding to a psychologist, they said, many times infancy built via his parent genes whic...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this child' or 'those children'?
Suggestion: this child; those children
...ffected that baby therefore, many times those child absorbed parents skills and talended. C...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22727272727 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65961441356 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618881118881 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7497087869 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.785714286 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246870467235 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785520008629 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781840392181 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155544027154 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987392550714 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.