The reading and the lecture both discuss the Mars Mission and the problems related to it. The reading thinks that the Mars Trip is impossible and not easy like the Moon mission. The lecturer casts doubt the claims made in the reading. She believes that the Mars trip would be challenging, but scientists found solutions to the problems that discussed in the article.
First of all, the reading states that the round trip to Mars and back would take at least two years, and it would be hard to take enough supplies of food, water, and oxygen and without them, the trip would be undoable. The lecture rejects this argument by pointing out that scientists solve the problem of the supplies by the Hydroponics. The lecturer states that Hydroponic is a technique of growing plants roots with water instead of soil. She says for this technique they use clean water papers which provides water for astronauts, and plants absorb carbon-dioxide gas and release oxygen, so astronauts get fresh air to breath.
Secondly, the reading suggests that astronauts on the Mars mission would be in the zero gravity which has negative effects on their muscles. However, the lecturer claims that a few decades astronauts orbited the earth many times and stayed in the zero gravity. Furthermore, the lecturer says that they used several techniques such as regular exercise and having Calcium vitamins will decrease the muscle mass and reduce the effect of the zero gravity.
Finally, the reading proposes that astronauts would expose to wide levels of dangerous radiation that come from the sun. The lecturer, on the other hand, notes that this solar radiation would be occasionally and not all the time. She demonstrates that astronauts used special equipment to detect the dangerous radiation and build a shelter to stay there until the dangerous radiation has passed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ble and not easy like the Moon mission. The lecturer casts doubt the claims made in...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, at least, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 3.15609756098 475% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 5.60731707317 446% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 965.302439024 161% => OK
No of words: 307.0 196.424390244 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05211726384 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5033839526 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 106.607317073 154% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534201954397 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 283.868780488 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.33902439024 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6215168775 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.785714286 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.00893830258045 0.215688989381 4% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00219979267807 0.103423049105 2% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.00793146529617 0.0843802449381 9% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00448315331906 0.15604864568 3% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00776504932673 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 40.7170731707 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.