the reading and the lecture both discuss whether or not the coin that was found was fake. The reading believes that the coin was fake. the lecturer casts doubt this, stating that the Norse brought to North america.
First of all, the reading argues that the distance between the Maine site is very far away from the Norse settlement. On the other hand, the lecturer provides an explanation for the great distance by stating that the Native american traveled to far place and they could have reached to the Norse settlement and brought the coin with them.
Secondly, the reading claims that there are no other coins have been found at the Canadian site which suggest that the Norse did not bring any coin to the Native Americans. The lecture rejects this claim by stating that the Norse went back to Europe and took their valuable objects with them including the coins. In addition, the lecturer illustrates the absences of coins in the Norse settlement.
Finally, the author of the article notes that the Norse known the coin was useless. It has been used by the European as money, but the Native Americans did not recognize it as money. The lecture, however, proposes that Native American valued attractive objects and since the coin was appealing and beautiful they used it for jewelry as necklace and rings. Furthermore, the lecturer demonstrates that because Native american was interesting with the coin the Norse could have been use the coin to trade with them.
The reading and the lecture
The reading and the lecture both discuss whether or not the coin that was found was fake. The reading believes that the coin was fake. The lecturer casts doubt this by stating that the Norse brought it to North america.
First of all, the reading argues that the distance between the Maine site is very far away from the Norse settlement. On the other hand, the lecturer provides an explanation for the great distance by stating that the Native american has many objects that got them from far places and not just the coins. They traveled to far place and they could have reached to the Norse settlement and brought the coin with them.
Secondly, the reading claims that there are no other coins have been found at the Canadian site which suggest that the Norse did not bring any coin to the Native Americans. The lecture rejects this claim by stating that the Norse went back to Europe and took their valuable objects with them including the coins. In addition, the lecturer illustrates the absences of coins in the Norse settlement.
Finally, the author of the article notes that the Norse known the coin was useless. It has been used by the European as money, but the Native Americans did not recognize it as money. The lecture, however, proposes that Native American valued attractive objects and since the coin was appealing and beautiful they used it for jewelry as necklace and rings. Furthermore, the lecturer demonstrates that because Native american was interesting with the coin the Norse could have been use the coin to trade with them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the reading and the lecture both discuss wh...
^^^
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...he reading and the lecture both discuss whether or not the coin that was found was fake. The r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...eading believes that the coin was fake. the lecturer casts doubt this, stating that...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88446215139 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28480411327 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494023904382 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 374.4 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8423626465 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.166666667 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.55908126344 0.272083759551 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.223812600959 0.0996497079465 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0954130547971 0.0662205650399 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.350771639284 0.162205337803 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544551914528 0.0443174109184 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.