The reading and the lecture both discuss the Mars Mission and the problems related to it. The reading thinks that the Mars Trip is impossible and not easy like the Moon mission. The lecturer casts doubt the claims made in the reading. She believes that the Mars trip would be challenging, but scientists found solutions to the problems that discussed in the article.
First of all, the reading states that the round trip to mars and back would take at least two years, and it would be hard to take enough supplies of food, water, and oxygen and without them the trip would be not doable.The lecture rejects this argument by pointing out that scientists solve the problem of the supplies by the Hydroponics. The lecturer states that Hydroponic is a technique of growing plants of roots and water instead of soil.She says for this technique they use clean water papers which provides water for astronauts, and plants used carbon-dioxide gas and release oxygen, so they get fresh air to breath.
Secondly, the reading suggests that astronauts on the mars mission would be in the zero gravity which affects their muscles. However, the lecturer claims that a few decades astronauts orbited the earth many times and stayed in the zero gravity. Furthermore, the lecturer says that they used several technique such as regular exercise and having vitamins will decrease the muscle mass and reduce the effect of the zero gravity.
Finally, the reading proposes that astronauts would expose to wide levels of dangerous radiation that come from the sun.The lecturer, on the other hand, notes that this solar radiation would be occasionally and not all the time. She demonstrates that they used special equipment to detect the dangerous radiation and build a shelter to stay there until the dangerous radiation has passed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ble and not easy like the Moon mission. The lecturer casts doubt the claims made in...
^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...thout them the trip would be not doable.The lecture rejects this argument by pointi...
^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: She
...ants of roots and water instead of soil.She says for this technique they use clean ...
^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun technique seems to be countable; consider using: 'several techniques'.
Suggestion: several techniques
...rmore, the lecturer says that they used several technique such as regular exercise and having vit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...gerous radiation that come from the sun.The lecturer, on the other hand, notes that...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, at least, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02317880795 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48633165417 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526490066225 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.6726205997 49.2860985944 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.909090909 110.228320801 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4545454545 21.698381199 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.06452816374 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.