Tpo 44
The professor in the lecture shows strong doubt over writer arguments ans she says coins discovered in Maine is a genuine evidence of historical evidence.
At the beginning, even though the reading paragraph suggests that, the distance between the Mine site and the Norse settlements in Canada is more that a thousand kilometers, is the coin was discovered is located very far from other sites documenting a Norse presence in North America. But the lecturer argues that, many other objects were found in Maine site from far distance. Native who lived in Maine site were interested to obtain objects from other locations, and they might reached to Norse settlements and brought back coins to their sites.
Second, despite the statements in the reading passage that, no other coins have been found at the Canadian sites that were inhabited by the Norse, so Norse did not bring any silver coins with them to their North America settlements. The professor contends that, Norths did not create permanent settlements, and they packed up their objects. Therefore, it is possible that they left some coins when they returned, and native took coins back to their site.
Finally, the author asserts that, norse who traveled to North America would have understood that silver coins would most like be useless to them because native north americas did not recognize silver coins as money. While the professor proves that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that, North knew native North America valued attractive and unusual objects, and silver coins were attracted them because they could make neglects or other jewelry with them, thus Norse used silver coins for trade with them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, second, so, therefore, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13090909091 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36789546341 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.2956891292 49.2860985944 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.777777778 110.228320801 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5555555556 21.698381199 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.632106265879 0.272083759551 232% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.274733132778 0.0996497079465 276% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132825968263 0.0662205650399 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.361300934148 0.162205337803 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120744659125 0.0443174109184 272% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.3589403974 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.