Do you agree or disagree: company should pay for employees to get university degrees?
There is no shortage of debate about whether company must pay for employee to get university degrees or not. Although many believe company should not pay their employees to get university degrees and it is better to hire educated employee, I, on the other hand, believe companies should pay for employees to continue their education. I will address the most discernible reasons why I feel this way in the following.
To begin with, almost all university students like to work in big companies, and they expect to be hired in decent companies after their graduation. Admittedly, companies like hire educated people, because they believes educated employees will make a good image of their company. In contrast many big companies tend to hire lower educated people and then pay them to continue their education. Because doing this work reduce their cost, in order to they do not have to pay high salary to them at the beginning. Not only that but also, paying employees to get university degrees improves their loyalty to the company. For instance, I have been working in an advertising company for two years. My supervisor is our company interviewer and he use this method, and hire lower educated people. At the beginning I did not understand why he do that, but soon I realize this work has some advantages. Last summer we needed one computer programmer, and they forced to hire some one who had computer science master. They paid him about five thousand dollar each month, this money is equal to ten of my co-workes. However, he was a good guy but they fired him give months ago, instead they pay me to go to university and give my master degree in computer. They only pay one hundred dollar each week to me for that, and my supervisor told me they will pay me just five percent more when I get my promotion. Which is cost them more cheaper than hiring someone who has already master degree. However it is important to me but because they provide me this opportunity they will have my loyalty.
Moreover, work experience is one of the important thing in individual life. Hence, people whom their companies pay them to get their university degrees have a lot of work experience and they can combine their knowledge and their experience in their work place. Consequently, they performance will increased and they will contribute more profit for their companies. For instance, My father had worked in petruliom company. His company paid him to get his university degree while he was working in their company. Because he had some experience he passed his courses very fast and he used his experience and his new knowledges and helped his company to find new oil reservoirs. In contrast, one of his co-workes who was expert in that could not helped them, due to his old fashion methods.
In conclusion, it is for all the aforementioned reasons, I firmly believe that companies must pay for employees to get university degrees. This is because it’s give them employee loyalty and reduce their cost in long run, and because it will increase their performance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their graduation. Admittedly, companies like hire educated people, because they ...
^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'believe'
Suggestion: believe
...like hire educated people, because they believes educated employees will make a good ima...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
... make a good image of their company. In contrast many big companies tend to hire lower e...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 741, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'uses'.
Suggestion: uses
...visor is our company interviewer and he use this method, and hire lower educated pe...
^^^
Line 3, column 835, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...e beginning I did not understand why he do that, but soon I realize this work has ...
^^
Line 3, column 965, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...ter programmer, and they forced to hire some one who had computer science master. They p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1396, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e percent more when I get my promotion. Which is cost them more cheaper than hiring s...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1415, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cheaper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cheaper
... I get my promotion. Which is cost them more cheaper than hiring someone who has already mas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1479, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... someone who has already master degree. However it is important to me but because they ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...ce. Consequently, they performance will increased and they will contribute more profit fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 724, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ast, one of his co-workes who was expert in that could not helped them, due to hi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 93.0 43.0788530466 216% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2544.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 525.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84571428571 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62461814521 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445714285714 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 803.7 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2151076716 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8461538462 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1923076923 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288391043223 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995288819752 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117101851401 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24504764821 0.150856017488 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120751062551 0.0645574589148 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.