The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The table gives information about underground railway systems in various cities. This data is provided in three different categories like date opened, kilometers of route and passengers per year. Overall, the underground railway system was first introduced in the year 1863 in London and Tokyo has the highest number of passengers who travel by train.
To begin with, the longest railway lane with a total of about 394 kilometers was built in London with 775 million passengers per year. On the other hand, the shortest railway track is established in the year 1981 in Kyoto facilitating least number of people to travel accounting to 45 million in a year. Also, Los Angeles’s rail system which was started in 2001 with a length of 28 kilometers carries just 5 million more passengers compared to Kyoto railways.
However, the number of passengers travelling by train per year in Tokyo is 1927 and this was first started in 1927 with 155 kilometers of route. Paris has the second highest number of travelers following Tokyo accounting to about 1191 million people per year. A railway lane with a lenght of 126 kilometers was built in Washington DC in 1976 with 144 million passengers travelling every year.
To sum up, it is evident the longest railway track was built in early 1900’s and the primary means of transportation in Tokyo train.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 222, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'facilitating the least'.
Suggestion: facilitating the least
...s established in the year 1981 in Kyoto facilitating least number of people to travel accounting t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1132.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00884955752 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75208433814 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491150442478 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.7014169634 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.2 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101743612634 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694113887718 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124189722897 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757557618382 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743745956896 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.