The charts below show the percentage of food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below.
» You should write at least 150 words.
The pie chart illustrates the amount of money spent on restaurant and home food in four different years while, the line graph gives information about the number of meals taken per year in both fast food and sit-down restaurants for the same years. Overall, it can be seen that in the past restaurants were not so famous but now almost half of the people prefer hotel food. Among the type of meal, fast food is more popular when compared to sit-down restaurants.
To begin, the total amount spent on restaurant meals increased from 1970 to 2000. Firstly, in the year 1970 only 1% of the total expenditure was spent on the restaurants to have food while rest of the budget was for home food. However, this number significantly increased from 1970 to 2000. This number rose by 5% in 1980 accounting to 15%. The total amount of money invested on restaurant meals was more than a third in 1990 and reached 50% in 2000.
The line graph clearly shows that more number of people enjoyed having fast food when compared to restaurant meals. It started off with 20 meals per year for both type of meals in the year 1970. Both followed a similar pattern increasing gradually from 1970 to 2000. From the year 1980, number of meals taken per year significantly rose finishing off at a most of 85% in the year 2000. Sit-down restaurants also saw increase in the consumption of meals, but this number was almost half of fast food meals. All in all, in the past people preferred home food but now consume restaurant food and fast food restaurants are much popular among other food courts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | kaka singh | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | Annie442 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | rahulsd | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Chandrakumar Chanthujan | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Tosyne | 67 | view |
- Some people say watching TV is bad for children in all ways, others say it is good for children to get knowledge. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Nowadays many business meetings and training are happening online and not in real offices. Do you think advantages outweigh the disadvantages in this matter? 73
- The charts below show the percentage of food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.Write a report for a university lecturer descr 61
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994 according to United Nations statistics Describe the information shown below in your own words What implications do the indicators have for the countries Indicators Canada Japa 84
- We live in a world of technology these days. While the internet brings with it clear advantages, the problems in terms of control and security of information outweighs the advantages. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, third, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 280.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62142857143 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41334512531 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457142857143 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5647786 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4285714286 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386613079991 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142993922808 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984026908178 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295966076424 0.15604864568 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804193966263 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.