The best way for a government to solve the problem of traffic congestion is to provide free public transportation 24 hours 7 days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, traffic congestion has become a severe problem. Few people believe that the most effective way to tackle this problem is to make public transportation free of cost. Although I believe that this is one of the solution, I don’t think this the best way to solve this major issue.
To begin, there are several reasons why few people consider this as the best measure. Firstly, providing free public transportation means less of number of private vehicles on roads. This in turn will lead to significant fall in number of accidents that occur daily. To illustrate, it is easy to regulate and control traffic because of decreased vehicles. Secondly, if government facilitates public with free transport then most of them will prefer this means of transport in order to save their money. Also, introducing this measure helps poor people who can’t afford to travel daily.
Nevertheless, I believe the drawbacks of taking up this measure outweighs the benefits. One of the major loss by introducing this is to public. For example, government uses the income earned from these transportation services to give better facilities to public which might not be possible if it is free of cost. Also, in order to meet these expenses there are chances of imposing higher taxes on common people. This might affect the poorer sections of the society while rich people can afford to pay these unfair taxes. Moreover, people are habituated to comfort and luxurious life. Introducing this measure doesn’t mean that all the people will use only public transport. As a point in case, nowadays, the proportion of cars used is higher than bikes or any other private vehicles. This indicates that people give importance to their comfort and not money and thus continue using their own automobiles.
To sum up, providing public transportation service free of cost can be one of the possible way of tackling this issue, I believe there are many other solutions which can produce better results when implemented. All in all, both governments and people should try to make sure to reduce traffic jams for the betterment of the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: TO_TOO[4]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...f the major loss by introducing this is to public. For example, government uses th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05099150142 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70751588157 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538243626062 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0255464913 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.15 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.65 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181474304753 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595773949495 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599586073565 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135687945336 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443138908011 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.