The table below gives information about the value of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012

Essay topics:

The table below gives information about the value of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012

The given table illustrates the export value of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five other countries which is Japan, China, Mexico, Russia and Saudi Arabia from 2010 to 2012.

Overall it’s clear that there is a high demand for the kiwi fruit in Japan, although Saudi Arabia shows the least interest on the fruit.

While Japan shows the highest interest about the fruit which is $271,100.00 and growing rapidly over the years and in 2012 shows the highest of all comparing to other countries which is $ 325,300,000 in value. Secondly, export to china shows $74,900,000 in 2010 and also growing rapidly over the years and in 2012 it shows a value of $94,000,000.
Export to Mexico shows some fluctuations in the value which is $6,000,000 in 2010 and shows a drop of $3,600,000 in 2011 and a growth of $ 3,300,000 in 2012. According to the table the lowest export value shows in Saudi Arabia in 2010 and it rapidly decreasing over the years and in 2012 it shows a value of $ 82,000 which means the lowest value comparing to the other four countries.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$325'.
Suggestion: $325
...l comparing to other countries which is $ 325,300,000 in value. Secondly, export to c...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 63, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... some fluctuations in the value which is ,000,000 in 2010 and shows a drop of ,600...
^^
Line 6, column 100, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... is ,000,000 in 2010 and shows a drop of ,600,000 in 2011 and a growth of $ 3,300,...
^^
Line 6, column 134, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$3'.
Suggestion: $3
...rop of ,600,000 in 2011 and a growth of $ 3,300,000 in 2012. According to the table...
^^^
Line 6, column 305, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$82'.
Suggestion: $82
...e years and in 2012 it shows a value of $ 82,000 which means the lowest value compar...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, secondly, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67391304348 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28049631545 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434782608696 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.7790645839 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.333333333 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279683260905 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173068059029 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136102179278 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213785627532 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150246829189 0.0819641961636 183% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.87 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.