the table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

the table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates information about consumer spending of 5 different countries on different items in 2002. It is clear that food and tobacco were the most important factor that they spend their money.
The number of customer of Ireland and Turkey buying foodstuff and tobacco were significantly higher that is around 30% than the other 3 countries. In Spain, consumers spend 18.80% of their total earnings on foodstuff and tobacco, while Italy and Swede were slightly lower at 16%.
In 2002, Italians expand 9% of their net revenue, which is the higher figure for clothing and footwear. Whereas buyers of Ireland spent a little amount of money on clothes. Spain and Turkey consumer spending were near Ireland. To compare with other 4 countries, the figure for Sweden was relatively less that is 5.40% and spending on leisure and education were 3.22, which is near to Italy. Ireland and Spain got 2.21% and 1.98% which is 2 times less than Turkey that figures 4.35%.
In conclusion, according to the table, it is obvious that the foodstuff, beverages and tobacco were the most important consumer spending in the five countries and the customer expenditure of different countries was quite different.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...igher figure for clothing and footwear. Whereas buyers of Ireland spent a little amount...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10101010101 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56163687338 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.1243320565 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1873393977 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893753182603 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147332983025 0.0843802449381 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148591621882 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125955148367 0.0819641961636 154% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.