The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph depicts total minutes, in billions, of telephone calls, separated 3 different groups, in the UK over the period shown, 1995 to 2000. Overall, it can be seen that both international and mobiles increased for 7 years, but local phone calls stayed at a higher rate even dropped for last four years.
At the beginning of the time, in 1995, the patterns for the 3 different components were apparently different. The local calls comprised of 72 billion minutes, which was twice that of the phone calls to abroad and nations, whereas mobiles just stood under 5 minutes. Before fell back to 70 billion minutes in 2002, amount of minutes for local calls rose gradually to 90 over the first four years. The internal and external phone calls move steadily upward over the period shown. In the first year it was around 38 before increasing regularly to just over 60 billions of minutes in 2002.
According to graph said, although the rates of mobiles were the smallest amount, just fewer than 5 billion minutes, it slowly improved to 9 in 1998. In the last four years of given period minutes of all mobile calls rose dramatically to 45, becoming near to other factor.
To sum up, it is obvious that 3 different elements were clearly different in 1995, first year of period, but at the end of period all the figures became roughly same.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 555, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '60 billion'.
Suggestion: 60 billion
...efore increasing regularly to just over 60 billions of minutes in 2002. According to graph s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, if, whereas, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1108.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71489361702 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40483894253 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557446808511 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2649957167 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.8 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125343471106 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552970150176 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351923439733 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.070810859898 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409060581265 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.