The graph shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph shows how the average amount of greenhouse gas productions per person has changed over the period from 1967 to 2007 in 4 different countries, which are the UK, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal. Smoke emission is illustrated along the vertical axis in metric tonnes, and the time period is depicted on the horizontal axis.
According to the graph, UK is the only country that could reduce carbon dioxide release along the period shown, but in 1967 the figure of gas emission was around 11 metric tonnes, the highest amount among the countries depicted, and it still was the highest, about 9, by the time of 2007. While in Sweden there was a rise and fall. The number for fumes was just under 9 in the first year of the period, yet it dramatically fell to 7 in just 10 years, before peaking at around 10 in 1977, and it was still gradually decreasing by the end of the period.
For the both Italy and Portugal, there was an unstoppable increase. Italy had about 4.5 metric tonnes emissions per person in 1967, which was half of Sweden. Nevertheless, Italy had overcome the number of Sweden in 2007 by roughly 2 metric tonnes. Portugal was the lowest of all other, 1 metric tonne in 1967, and it noticeably increased until 2007, but it was still the lowest.
In conclusion, as the line graph provides, it is clear that the UK had the most carbon dioxide emission per person in 2007.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, so, still, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58232931727 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42280206356 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550200803213 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 0.482926829268 1657% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.1966758238 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.1 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213589321938 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100179186855 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751330702979 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156992635985 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542258580957 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.