Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
There is no doubt that growing traffic and pollution problems are becoming considerable trouble facing our world. There are many people who think that increasing the cost of gasoline would be the best way to solve this issue. I completely agree with this statement and in this essay, I will propose some of the measures that might be efficiency.
From point of my view, in order to solve matters such as traffic and pollution, the government should increase the price of petrol operating vehicles. If the cost of gas gets higher, people would be encouraged to choose a car using less gas. Those who own an automobile with a bigger engine which emits more fumes than others, for instance, would reconsider whether such cars are really needed to get around. Furthermore, people tend to take more public transport. As a result, our living condition will be better.
What’s more, another approach to reduce traffic density and smoke emission is to impose more taxation on cars according to its engine size and age. By doing this, not only amount of transport on the road that is out of date but also traffic would decrease. For example, according to research of vehicles quality in 2016, almost half of automobiles on the road were aged more than 10 years, which is considerable result. If the government can fulfill both of these measures, it could be effective to reduce traffic and fumes.
To sum up, it is possible to deal with the number of the cars and eliminate fumes from vehicles. From my point of view, both government and driver ought to take their actions to improve our living atmosphere.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 300, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ement and in this essay, I will propose some of the measures that might be efficiency. Fr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, really, so, for example, for instance, no doubt, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82608695652 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52282169001 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601449275362 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3582565902 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1428571429 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173976726031 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546996530885 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526055402703 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941407750888 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725263319331 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.