Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
The continuous grow of traffic and pollution had been a constant problem for the past decades since the rise of the number of cars used everyday by commuters. A solution implemented by governments was the petrol price hike. I totally disagree with this as there are other ways to solve the issue.
From what I watched from the news, increasing petrol price creates more harm than good. The people who are more affected with this are not the one with private cars but the drivers of public vehicles like buses, vans, and taxis; then consequently, the public commuters. The price hike usually leads to the said drivers striking against the government, which means that will not drive for a day or two depending on the outcome. Because of this, more commuters will be stranded and may not be able to go to their work or schools. Another dilemma that may arise is that fair price will go up as well, which may end to the same situation as the previous one.
there other measures that I think would be effective in solving the problem. First, is the use of bicycles. there are countries that practiced the use of bicycles as a major mode of transportation such as The Netherlands, Germany, Korea. I believe other countries can adapt to the same thing by putting bicycle lanes on the roads to make them safer for cyclists. In my own country, the Philippines, it is becoming more popular recently. Second, the use of more public utility vehicles as these types of automobiles can carry more passengers than small and private ones. For example, twenty people going to the same destination can fit into one mini bus or van, whereas it may take 4-5 saloon cars if they choose to use those. Lastly, aside from these big public vehicles, there are alternative types that are way cheaper and eco-friendly. these include the tuktuk from Asian countries like Thailand and Myanmar, tricycles, and jeepneys from the Philippines.these are usually used for short distance travel though, but as they say, little is better than nothing.
In conclusion, i trust that the government can come up with more reasonable actions to solve traffic and pollution problems than increasing the price of petrol.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h private cars but the drivers of public vehicles like buses, vans, and taxis; th...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...me situation as the previous one. there other measures that I think would be ef...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...problem. First, is the use of bicycles. there are countries that practiced the use of...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 840, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
... that are way cheaper and eco-friendly. these include the tuktuk from Asian countries...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 16, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...tter than nothing. In conclusion, i trust that the government can come up w...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, lastly, may, second, so, then, well, whereas, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.856 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59743463184 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554666666667 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.742662988 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.166666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146782598654 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532900736377 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697056573283 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110458935542 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447263808198 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.