Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is undeniable true that as the world industrialize and population increases, road or railway between cities and countries is required. By spending money railways lots of opportunity will be given to people and state. Therefore, I completely agree with that government need to expend money on railways instead of roads.
First of all, commerce will be able to increase through investigating on railways. Carrying import and export materials by railways would strengthen relations with other countries and expenditures for distribution would be less. For instance, transferring goods on railway used to transport by roads can carry a more cargo than by blacktop once and shipping cost would be cheap. Also in order to convey such raw materials as coal, a railway is more comfortable. Furthermore, railways are more essential than land roads for landlocked countries such as Mongolia because they act as a crucial role for trade.
What’s more, to get better public transportation, building railways has more effect than paving the ways. It would be easier to get detached cities connected by railways for people and the government ought to spend money on underground railways instead of roads in cities. By doing this, they can reduce fumes emitted from vehicles. For example, traffic jam and air pollution has reached its peak in my country. In order to solve these problems, the government needs to consider underground transportation as a solution. If they can fulfill it, it will be better for those to survive.
In conclusion, due to the reasons I expressed above, I think that the government should spend money on railways rather than roads to create better environment to live and for development of state.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20863309353 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9465943213 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571942446043 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4272325515 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243372015862 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830055245227 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784862694549 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172341075107 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616784754929 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.