The table below gives the information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.

The tabular depicts the sort of items consuming in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Turkey in 2002. Units are measured in percentages.
Overall, the amount of money that spend on food/drinks/tobacco is very far higher than the other items, and the clothing /footwear declines by a third part of it. Leisure/education is the lowest spending area which occupies a fifth part in food/drinks/tobacco. Turkey and Ireland spend more percentage than remaining countries. Here the least consumed country is Sweden but in leisure/education Spain spends the least.
In 2002, Turkey is the country which consumed spending more amount on Food/Drinks/Tobacco with 32.14% and then 6.63 in clothing/footwear where as 4.35 in leisure/education. Ireland spends a little amount decreased by turkey with 2percentage on all items but clothing/footwear remains the same.
Italy spend more than Spain and Sweden. In contrast Spain spend more in food/drink/tobacco than Italy with the 18.80 and 16.36%respectively, and 15.77 is the least spend by Sweden. Clothing/Footwear declines about 2 percent for country to country. Highest consumed country is Italy. In contrast, Sweden is the lowest one Spain spend only 1.98 in leisure/education. But Italy and Sweden spend 3.20 and 3.22 % respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
....14% and then 6.63 in clothing/footwear where as 4.35 in leisure/education. Ireland spen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 43, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ly spend more than Spain and Sweden. In contrast Spain spend more in food/drink/tobacco ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, third, in contrast, sort of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59585492228 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.90759729396 2.65546596893 147% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528497409326 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6425648809 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.1428571429 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7857142857 22.9334400587 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16740998517 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741664033393 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459087040487 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119670957955 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0109191045974 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.