The rendered tabular data elucidates money shelled out on different purchasings and enjoying purposes in five different nations in year 2002.
Overall, it is conspicuous that large amount of expenditure went on Food/Drink/Tabacco, whereas money spent on Education/leisure was least in all countries.
At the very fleeting glance, it is lucid that the highest proportion of money spent on Food, Drink and Tabacco by turkish was 32.14%, however swedish spent the minimum, which was its half. Irishes remained the second highest by spending 28.19%. The respective figure for Italy and Spain was 16.38% and 18.80%, respectively.
Turning towards Clothing and Footware expenditure, the minimum amount of money had been spent on the following category by Italians, accounted for 9.0%. Similarly, money spent by counterparts was ranging from 5% to 6%. As far as Leisure and Education is concerned, people of Sweden and Italy incurred same percentage of money, accounting to above 3.00%. The difference of 2.00% was witnessed between Ireland (2.21%) and Turkey (4.35%). Merely 1.98% of money was utilized on Leisure/Education by spanishes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ture went on Food/Drink/Tabacco, whereas money spent on Education/leisure was ...
^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as money spent on Education/leisure was least in all countries. At the very f...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...er swedish spent the minimum, which was its half. Irishes remained the second highe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, similarly, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53448275862 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14523275773 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.814408214 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0860208472453 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038988483886 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730240793113 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0718262822462 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0953492704012 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.