Some people say that a person’s success is as a result of the way he has been brought up by his parents. Do you agree or disagree?

It is generally argued that the major driving force behind the successful life of a person is his family. I, however, believe that parental guidance is not solely responsible for grooming of an Individual, other valuable factors also stand.

To commence with, for the achievement of a successful life, parents really play a vital role. Parents have an immense influence on their children's lives as many chlidren tread the path their parents teach. Probably, many children imbibe the habits of their parents. To cite an example, if father of a child wake up at 5:00 o'clock, then the child will also like to get up at the same time, which will be proved as beneficial for his life. Moreover, parents can instill moral and ethical values in their children by alloting them information of their ancestors. Otherwise, the children oftentimes throw cultural and moral values into the wind, which has some repercussions like corruption, vulgarity, and so on.

On the contrary, friends also cast some positive impacts on a person to succeed in life. First of all, teamwork is much more essential to bring up a person's succession. A person may build his confidence, intellect and other necessarial motor skills by competing with peers and friends due to which a person may become able to confront arduous endeavours in life. What is more, an individual can learn different strategies to cope up with diverse people alongwith some fundamental ideology in order to handle variable tasks to a great extent; henceforth other aspects have also a part and parcel role to develop as a successful person.

To conclude, by taking aforementioned information into consideration, it is clear that the family is not only creditable for a person's success, but freinds and other objectives are also crucial.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of a person is his family. I, however, believe that parental guidance is not so...
^^
Line 4, column 324, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: o'clock
...e, if father of a child wake up at 5:00 oclock, then the child will also like to get ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ather of a child wake up at 5:00 oclock, then the child will also like to get up ...
^^
Line 4, column 643, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cultural and moral values into the wind, which has some repercussions like corrup...
^^
Line 6, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lgarity, and so on. On the contrary, friends also cast some positive impacts ...
^^
Line 6, column 151, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...rk is much more essential to bring up a persons succession. A person may build his conf...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 128, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...the family is not only creditable for a persons success, but freinds and other objectiv...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, still, then, first of all, on the contrary, what is more, to a great extent

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08474576271 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80229314724 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606779661017 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4165614192 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.384615385 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150394750298 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545809824433 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390486929441 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886864004518 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405213632478 0.056905535591 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.